fix CVE-2022-4283,CVE-2022-46340,CVE-2022-46341,CVE-2022-46342,CVE-2022-46343,CVE-2022-46344

This commit is contained in:
zhouwenpei 2022-12-21 08:01:48 +00:00
parent b3bcbe836c
commit dab29a67df
7 changed files with 364 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
From ccdd431cd8f1cabae9d744f0514b6533c438908c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 15:55:54 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] xkb: reset the radio_groups pointer to NULL after freeing it
Unlike other elements of the keymap, this pointer was freed but not
reset. On a subsequent XkbGetKbdByName request, the server may access
already freed memory.
CVE-2022-4283, ZDI-CAN-19530
This vulnerability was discovered by:
Jan-Niklas Sohn working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
---
xkb/xkbUtils.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/xkb/xkbUtils.c b/xkb/xkbUtils.c
index dd089c204..3f5791a18 100644
--- a/xkb/xkbUtils.c
+++ b/xkb/xkbUtils.c
@@ -1326,6 +1326,7 @@ _XkbCopyNames(XkbDescPtr src, XkbDescPtr dst)
}
else {
free(dst->names->radio_groups);
+ dst->names->radio_groups = NULL;
}
dst->names->num_rg = src->names->num_rg;
--
GitLab

View File

@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
From b320ca0ffe4c0c872eeb3a93d9bde21f765c7c63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 12:55:45 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Xtest: disallow GenericEvents in XTestSwapFakeInput
XTestSwapFakeInput assumes all events in this request are
sizeof(xEvent) and iterates through these in 32-byte increments.
However, a GenericEvent may be of arbitrary length longer than 32 bytes,
so any GenericEvent in this list would result in subsequent events to be
misparsed.
Additional, the swapped event is written into a stack-allocated struct
xEvent (size 32 bytes). For any GenericEvent longer than 32 bytes,
swapping the event may thus smash the stack like an avocado on toast.
Catch this case early and return BadValue for any GenericEvent.
Which is what would happen in unswapped setups anyway since XTest
doesn't support GenericEvent.
CVE-2022-46340, ZDI-CAN 19265
This vulnerability was discovered by:
Jan-Niklas Sohn working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
---
Xext/xtest.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Xext/xtest.c b/Xext/xtest.c
index bf27eb590..2985a4ce6 100644
--- a/Xext/xtest.c
+++ b/Xext/xtest.c
@@ -502,10 +502,11 @@ XTestSwapFakeInput(ClientPtr client, xReq * req)
nev = ((req->length << 2) - sizeof(xReq)) / sizeof(xEvent);
for (ev = (xEvent *) &req[1]; --nev >= 0; ev++) {
+ int evtype = ev->u.u.type & 0x177;
/* Swap event */
- proc = EventSwapVector[ev->u.u.type & 0177];
+ proc = EventSwapVector[evtype];
/* no swapping proc; invalid event type? */
- if (!proc || proc == NotImplemented) {
+ if (!proc || proc == NotImplemented || evtype == GenericEvent) {
client->errorValue = ev->u.u.type;
return BadValue;
}
--
GitLab

View File

@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
From 51eb63b0ee1509c6c6b8922b0e4aa037faa6f78b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:55:32 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Xi: disallow passive grabs with a detail > 255
The XKB protocol effectively prevents us from ever using keycodes above
255. For buttons it's theoretically possible but realistically too niche
to worry about. For all other passive grabs, the detail must be zero
anyway.
This fixes an OOB write:
ProcXIPassiveUngrabDevice() calls DeletePassiveGrabFromList with a
temporary grab struct which contains tempGrab->detail.exact = stuff->detail.
For matching existing grabs, DeleteDetailFromMask is called with the
stuff->detail value. This function creates a new mask with the one bit
representing stuff->detail cleared.
However, the array size for the new mask is 8 * sizeof(CARD32) bits,
thus any detail above 255 results in an OOB array write.
CVE-2022-46341, ZDI-CAN 19381
This vulnerability was discovered by:
Jan-Niklas Sohn working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
---
Xi/xipassivegrab.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Xi/xipassivegrab.c b/Xi/xipassivegrab.c
index 2769fb7c9..c9ac2f855 100644
--- a/Xi/xipassivegrab.c
+++ b/Xi/xipassivegrab.c
@@ -137,6 +137,12 @@ ProcXIPassiveGrabDevice(ClientPtr client)
return BadValue;
}
+ /* XI2 allows 32-bit keycodes but thanks to XKB we can never
+ * implement this. Just return an error for all keycodes that
+ * cannot work anyway, same for buttons > 255. */
+ if (stuff->detail > 255)
+ return XIAlreadyGrabbed;
+
if (XICheckInvalidMaskBits(client, (unsigned char *) &stuff[1],
stuff->mask_len * 4) != Success)
return BadValue;
@@ -207,14 +213,8 @@ ProcXIPassiveGrabDevice(ClientPtr client)
&param, XI2, &mask);
break;
case XIGrabtypeKeycode:
- /* XI2 allows 32-bit keycodes but thanks to XKB we can never
- * implement this. Just return an error for all keycodes that
- * cannot work anyway */
- if (stuff->detail > 255)
- status = XIAlreadyGrabbed;
- else
- status = GrabKey(client, dev, mod_dev, stuff->detail,
- &param, XI2, &mask);
+ status = GrabKey(client, dev, mod_dev, stuff->detail,
+ &param, XI2, &mask);
break;
case XIGrabtypeEnter:
case XIGrabtypeFocusIn:
@@ -334,6 +334,12 @@ ProcXIPassiveUngrabDevice(ClientPtr client)
return BadValue;
}
+ /* We don't allow passive grabs for details > 255 anyway */
+ if (stuff->detail > 255) {
+ client->errorValue = stuff->detail;
+ return BadValue;
+ }
+
rc = dixLookupWindow(&win, stuff->grab_window, client, DixSetAttrAccess);
if (rc != Success)
return rc;
--
GitLab

View File

@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
From b79f32b57cc0c1186b2899bce7cf89f7b325161b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:20:40 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Xext: free the XvRTVideoNotify when turning off from the same
client
This fixes a use-after-free bug:
When a client first calls XvdiSelectVideoNotify() on a drawable with a
TRUE onoff argument, a struct XvVideoNotifyRec is allocated. This struct
is added twice to the resources:
- as the drawable's XvRTVideoNotifyList. This happens only once per
drawable, subsequent calls append to this list.
- as the client's XvRTVideoNotify. This happens for every client.
The struct keeps the ClientPtr around once it has been added for a
client. The idea, presumably, is that if the client disconnects we can remove
all structs from the drawable's list that match the client (by resetting
the ClientPtr to NULL), but if the drawable is destroyed we can remove
and free the whole list.
However, if the same client then calls XvdiSelectVideoNotify() on the
same drawable with a FALSE onoff argument, only the ClientPtr on the
existing struct was set to NULL. The struct itself remained in the
client's resources.
If the drawable is now destroyed, the resource system invokes
XvdiDestroyVideoNotifyList which frees the whole list for this drawable
- including our struct. This function however does not free the resource
for the client since our ClientPtr is NULL.
Later, when the client is destroyed and the resource system invokes
XvdiDestroyVideoNotify, we unconditionally set the ClientPtr to NULL. On
a struct that has been freed previously. This is generally frowned upon.
Fix this by calling FreeResource() on the second call instead of merely
setting the ClientPtr to NULL. This removes the struct from the client
resources (but not from the list), ensuring that it won't be accessed
again when the client quits.
Note that the assignment tpn->client = NULL; is superfluous since the
XvdiDestroyVideoNotify function will do this anyway. But it's left for
clarity and to match a similar invocation in XvdiSelectPortNotify.
CVE-2022-46342, ZDI-CAN 19400
This vulnerability was discovered by:
Jan-Niklas Sohn working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
---
Xext/xvmain.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Xext/xvmain.c b/Xext/xvmain.c
index f62747193..2a08f8744 100644
--- a/Xext/xvmain.c
+++ b/Xext/xvmain.c
@@ -811,8 +811,10 @@ XvdiSelectVideoNotify(ClientPtr client, DrawablePtr pDraw, BOOL onoff)
tpn = pn;
while (tpn) {
if (tpn->client == client) {
- if (!onoff)
+ if (!onoff) {
tpn->client = NULL;
+ FreeResource(tpn->id, XvRTVideoNotify);
+ }
return Success;
}
if (!tpn->client)
--
GitLab

View File

@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
From 842ca3ccef100ce010d1d8f5f6d6cc1915055900 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:53:07 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Xext: free the screen saver resource when replacing it
This fixes a use-after-free bug:
When a client first calls ScreenSaverSetAttributes(), a struct
ScreenSaverAttrRec is allocated and added to the client's
resources.
When the same client calls ScreenSaverSetAttributes() again, a new
struct ScreenSaverAttrRec is allocated, replacing the old struct. The
old struct was freed but not removed from the clients resources.
Later, when the client is destroyed the resource system invokes
ScreenSaverFreeAttr and attempts to clean up the already freed struct.
Fix this by letting the resource system free the old attrs instead.
CVE-2022-46343, ZDI-CAN 19404
This vulnerability was discovered by:
Jan-Niklas Sohn working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
---
Xext/saver.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Xext/saver.c b/Xext/saver.c
index f813ba08d..fd6153c31 100644
--- a/Xext/saver.c
+++ b/Xext/saver.c
@@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ ScreenSaverSetAttributes(ClientPtr client)
pVlist++;
}
if (pPriv->attr)
- FreeScreenAttr(pPriv->attr);
+ FreeResource(pPriv->attr->resource, AttrType);
pPriv->attr = pAttr;
pAttr->resource = FakeClientID(client->index);
if (!AddResource(pAttr->resource, AttrType, (void *) pAttr))
--
GitLab

View File

@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
From 8f454b793e1f13c99872c15f0eed1d7f3b823fe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:26:57 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Xi: avoid integer truncation in length check of
ProcXIChangeProperty
This fixes an OOB read and the resulting information disclosure.
Length calculation for the request was clipped to a 32-bit integer. With
the correct stuff->num_items value the expected request size was
truncated, passing the REQUEST_FIXED_SIZE check.
The server then proceeded with reading at least stuff->num_items bytes
(depending on stuff->format) from the request and stuffing whatever it
finds into the property. In the process it would also allocate at least
stuff->num_items bytes, i.e. 4GB.
The same bug exists in ProcChangeProperty and ProcXChangeDeviceProperty,
so let's fix that too.
CVE-2022-46344, ZDI-CAN 19405
This vulnerability was discovered by:
Jan-Niklas Sohn working with Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative
Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
Acked-by: Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>
---
Xi/xiproperty.c | 4 ++--
dix/property.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Xi/xiproperty.c b/Xi/xiproperty.c
index 68c362c62..066ba21fb 100644
--- a/Xi/xiproperty.c
+++ b/Xi/xiproperty.c
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ ProcXChangeDeviceProperty(ClientPtr client)
REQUEST(xChangeDevicePropertyReq);
DeviceIntPtr dev;
unsigned long len;
- int totalSize;
+ uint64_t totalSize;
int rc;
REQUEST_AT_LEAST_SIZE(xChangeDevicePropertyReq);
@@ -1130,7 +1130,7 @@ ProcXIChangeProperty(ClientPtr client)
{
int rc;
DeviceIntPtr dev;
- int totalSize;
+ uint64_t totalSize;
unsigned long len;
REQUEST(xXIChangePropertyReq);
diff --git a/dix/property.c b/dix/property.c
index 94ef5a0ec..acce94b2c 100644
--- a/dix/property.c
+++ b/dix/property.c
@@ -205,7 +205,8 @@ ProcChangeProperty(ClientPtr client)
WindowPtr pWin;
char format, mode;
unsigned long len;
- int sizeInBytes, totalSize, err;
+ int sizeInBytes, err;
+ uint64_t totalSize;
REQUEST(xChangePropertyReq);
--
GitLab

View File

@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
Name: xorg-x11-server Name: xorg-x11-server
Version: 1.20.11 Version: 1.20.11
Release: 12 Release: 13
Summary: X.Org X11 X server Summary: X.Org X11 X server
License: MIT and GPLv2 License: MIT and GPLv2
URL: https://www.x.org URL: https://www.x.org
@ -94,6 +94,12 @@ Patch6008: backport-CVE-2022-3551.patch
Patch6009: xorg-server-1.20.11-sw.patch Patch6009: xorg-server-1.20.11-sw.patch
%endif %endif
Patch6010: backport-CVE-2022-3553.patch Patch6010: backport-CVE-2022-3553.patch
Patch6011: backport-CVE-2022-4283.patch
Patch6012: backport-CVE-2022-46340.patch
Patch6013: backport-CVE-2022-46341.patch
Patch6014: backport-CVE-2022-46342.patch
Patch6015: backport-CVE-2022-46343.patch
Patch6016: backport-CVE-2022-46344.patch
BuildRequires: audit-libs-devel autoconf automake bison dbus-devel flex git gcc BuildRequires: audit-libs-devel autoconf automake bison dbus-devel flex git gcc
BuildRequires: systemtap-sdt-devel libtool pkgconfig BuildRequires: systemtap-sdt-devel libtool pkgconfig
@ -437,6 +443,9 @@ find %{inst_srcdir}/hw/xfree86 -name \*.c -delete
%{_mandir}/man*/* %{_mandir}/man*/*
%changelog %changelog
* Wed Dec 21 2022 zhouwenpei <zhouwenpei1@h-partners.com> -1.20.11-13
- fix CVE-2022-4283,CVE-2022-46340,CVE-2022-46341,CVE-2022-46342,CVE-2022-46343,CVE-2022-46344
* Fri Nov 18 2022 wangkerong <wangkerong@h-partners.com> -1.20.11-12 * Fri Nov 18 2022 wangkerong <wangkerong@h-partners.com> -1.20.11-12
- fix CVE-2022-3551,CVE-2022-3553 - fix CVE-2022-3551,CVE-2022-3553