packages/openjdk-latest
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

!34 I4HVLP: bumped buildjdkver to build by itself - 17

Browse Source 
From: @jvmboy
Reviewed-by: @kuenking111
Signed-off-by: @kuenking111
This commit is contained in:
openeuler-ci-bot 2021-11-11 09:22:22 +00:00 committed by Gitee
commit e2a9aafd9d
2 changed files with 7 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
README.md
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
Rolling release of (usually) STSs OpenJDK by openEuler Community.
OpenJDK has release cadence of 6 months, but 3/4 of them are Short Term Supported for 6 months only. This package is designed to harbor them. Currently it is build of OpenJDK 16. LTSs will go also as separate packages.
OpenJDK has release cadence of 6 months, but 3/4 of them are Short Term Supported for 6 months only. This package is designed to harbor them. Currently it is build of OpenJDK 17. LTSs will go also as separate packages.
JDK16 is current release of Java platform. It is bringing many cool improvements - https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/16/. Unluckily, this package is STS (short term support) version. Between individual LTS there will be always several STS. Again, please see announcement: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2017-September/004281.html. So this is rolling release of all STSs to come. Its fate during the release of fresh LTS is yet to be decided.
JDK17 is current release of Java platform. It is bringing many cool improvements - https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/17/. Unluckily, this package is STS (short term support) version. Between individual LTS there will be always several STS. Again, please see announcement: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2017-September/004281.html. So this is rolling release of all STSs to come. Its fate during the release of fresh LTS is yet to be decided.

7
openjdk-latest.spec
View File

@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
# buildjdkver is usually same as %%{majorver},
# but in time of bootstrap of next jdk, it is majorver-1,
# and this it is better to change it here, on single place
%global buildjdkver 16
%global buildjdkver 17
# We don't add any LTS designator for STS packages (this package).
# Neither for Fedora nor EPEL which would have %%{rhel} macro defined.
%global lts_designator ""
@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
%global top_level_dir_name %{origin}
%global minorver 0
%global buildver 35
%global rpmrelease 0
%global rpmrelease 1
# priority must be 8 digits in total; up to openjdk 1.8, we were using 18..... so when we moved to 11, we had to add another digit
%if %is_system_jdk
%global priority %( printf '%02d%02d%02d%02d' %{majorver} %{minorver} %{securityver} %{buildver} )
@ -1732,6 +1732,9 @@ require "copy_jdk_configs.lua"
%changelog
* Thu Nov 11 2021 noah <hedongbo@huawei.com> - 1:17.0.0.35-1-rolling
- Bumped buildjdkver to build by itself - 17
* Sun Nov 7 2021 noah <hedongbo@huawei.com> - 1:17.0.0.35-0.0.ea.rolling
- Update to jdk-17.0.0.0+35
- change path to the version-numbers.conf