!34 I4HVLP: bumped buildjdkver to build by itself - 17
From: @jvmboy Reviewed-by: @kuenking111 Signed-off-by: @kuenking111
This commit is contained in:
commit
e2a9aafd9d
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||||||
Rolling release of (usually) STSs OpenJDK by openEuler Community.
|
Rolling release of (usually) STSs OpenJDK by openEuler Community.
|
||||||
OpenJDK has release cadence of 6 months, but 3/4 of them are Short Term Supported for 6 months only. This package is designed to harbor them. Currently it is build of OpenJDK 16. LTSs will go also as separate packages.
|
OpenJDK has release cadence of 6 months, but 3/4 of them are Short Term Supported for 6 months only. This package is designed to harbor them. Currently it is build of OpenJDK 17. LTSs will go also as separate packages.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
JDK16 is current release of Java platform. It is bringing many cool improvements - https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/16/. Unluckily, this package is STS (short term support) version. Between individual LTS there will be always several STS. Again, please see announcement: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2017-September/004281.html. So this is rolling release of all STSs to come. Its fate during the release of fresh LTS is yet to be decided.
|
JDK17 is current release of Java platform. It is bringing many cool improvements - https://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/17/. Unluckily, this package is STS (short term support) version. Between individual LTS there will be always several STS. Again, please see announcement: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2017-September/004281.html. So this is rolling release of all STSs to come. Its fate during the release of fresh LTS is yet to be decided.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
|
|||||||
# buildjdkver is usually same as %%{majorver},
|
# buildjdkver is usually same as %%{majorver},
|
||||||
# but in time of bootstrap of next jdk, it is majorver-1,
|
# but in time of bootstrap of next jdk, it is majorver-1,
|
||||||
# and this it is better to change it here, on single place
|
# and this it is better to change it here, on single place
|
||||||
%global buildjdkver 16
|
%global buildjdkver 17
|
||||||
# We don't add any LTS designator for STS packages (this package).
|
# We don't add any LTS designator for STS packages (this package).
|
||||||
# Neither for Fedora nor EPEL which would have %%{rhel} macro defined.
|
# Neither for Fedora nor EPEL which would have %%{rhel} macro defined.
|
||||||
%global lts_designator ""
|
%global lts_designator ""
|
||||||
@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
|
|||||||
%global top_level_dir_name %{origin}
|
%global top_level_dir_name %{origin}
|
||||||
%global minorver 0
|
%global minorver 0
|
||||||
%global buildver 35
|
%global buildver 35
|
||||||
%global rpmrelease 0
|
%global rpmrelease 1
|
||||||
# priority must be 8 digits in total; up to openjdk 1.8, we were using 18..... so when we moved to 11, we had to add another digit
|
# priority must be 8 digits in total; up to openjdk 1.8, we were using 18..... so when we moved to 11, we had to add another digit
|
||||||
%if %is_system_jdk
|
%if %is_system_jdk
|
||||||
%global priority %( printf '%02d%02d%02d%02d' %{majorver} %{minorver} %{securityver} %{buildver} )
|
%global priority %( printf '%02d%02d%02d%02d' %{majorver} %{minorver} %{securityver} %{buildver} )
|
||||||
@ -1732,6 +1732,9 @@ require "copy_jdk_configs.lua"
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
%changelog
|
%changelog
|
||||||
|
* Thu Nov 11 2021 noah <hedongbo@huawei.com> - 1:17.0.0.35-1-rolling
|
||||||
|
- Bumped buildjdkver to build by itself - 17
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Sun Nov 7 2021 noah <hedongbo@huawei.com> - 1:17.0.0.35-0.0.ea.rolling
|
* Sun Nov 7 2021 noah <hedongbo@huawei.com> - 1:17.0.0.35-0.0.ea.rolling
|
||||||
- Update to jdk-17.0.0.0+35
|
- Update to jdk-17.0.0.0+35
|
||||||
- change path to the version-numbers.conf
|
- change path to the version-numbers.conf
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user