!8 I5MF63: test/jdk/java/lang/SecurityManager/CheckSecurityProvider.java failed

From: @kuenking111 
Reviewed-by: @jvmboy 
Signed-off-by: @jvmboy
This commit is contained in:
openeuler-ci-bot 2022-08-16 02:52:18 +00:00 committed by Gitee
commit 4728f396a9
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 173E9B9CA92EEF8F
4 changed files with 6 additions and 128 deletions

View File

@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ Provides: java-src%{?1} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Name: java-%{javaver}-%{origin}
Version: %{newjavaver}.%{buildver}
Release: 1
Release: 2
# java-1.5.0-ibm from jpackage.org set Epoch to 1 for unknown reasons
# and this change was brought into RHEL-4. java-1.5.0-ibm packages
@ -943,15 +943,11 @@ Source14: TestECDSA.java
# NSS via SunPKCS11 Provider (disabled comment
# due to memory leak).
Patch1000: rh1648249-add_commented_out_nss_cfg_provider_to_java_security.patch
# Ignore AWTError when assistive technologies are loaded
Patch1: rh1648242-accessible_toolkit_crash_do_not_break_jvm.patch
# Restrict access to java-atk-wrapper classes
Patch2: rh1648644-java_access_bridge_privileged_security.patch
Patch3: rh649512-remove_uses_of_far_in_jpeg_libjpeg_turbo_1_4_compat_for_jdk10_and_up.patch
# Follow system wide crypto policy RHBZ#1249083
Patch4: pr3183-rh1340845-support_system_crypto_policy.patch
# Depend on pcs-lite-libs instead of pcs-lite-devel as this is only in optional repo
Patch6: rh1684077-openjdk_should_depend_on_pcsc-lite-libs_instead_of_pcsc-lite-devel.patch
@ -1195,9 +1191,7 @@ fi
pushd %{top_level_dir_name}
%patch1 -p1
%patch2 -p1
%patch3 -p1
%patch4 -p1
%patch6 -p1
%patch7 -p1
%patch8 -p1
@ -1212,8 +1206,6 @@ pushd %{top_level_dir_name}
%patch17 -p1
popd # openjdk
%patch1000
# Extract systemtap tapsets
%if %{with_systemtap}
tar --strip-components=1 -x -I xz -f %{SOURCE8}
@ -1763,6 +1755,11 @@ cjc.mainProgram(arg)
%changelog
* Fri Aug 5 2022 kuenking111 <wangkun49@huawei.com> - 1:17.0.4.8-0.2
- del pr3183-rh1340845-support_system_crypto_policy.patch
- del rh1648249-add_commented_out_nss_cfg_provider_to_java_security.patch
- del rh1648644-java_access_bridge_privileged_security.patch
* Fri Aug 5 2022 kuenking111 <wangkun49@huawei.com> - 1:17.0.4.8-0.1
- add 8290705_fix_StringConcat_validate_mem_flow_asserts_with_unexpected_userStoreI.patch

View File

@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
# HG changeset patch
# User andrew
# Date 1478057514 0
# Node ID 1c4d5cb2096ae55106111da200b0bcad304f650c
# Parent 3d53f19b48384e5252f4ec8891f7a3a82d77af2a
diff -r 3d53f19b4838 -r 1c4d5cb2096a src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Security.java
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Security.java Wed Oct 26 03:51:39 2016 +0100
+++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/security/Security.java Wed Nov 02 03:31:54 2016 +0000
@@ -43,6 +43,9 @@
* implementation-specific location, which is typically the properties file
* {@code conf/security/java.security} in the Java installation directory.
*
+ * <p>Additional default values of security properties are read from a
+ * system-specific location, if available.</p>
+ *
* @author Benjamin Renaud
* @since 1.1
*/
@@ -52,6 +55,10 @@
private static final Debug sdebug =
Debug.getInstance("properties");
+ /* System property file*/
+ private static final String SYSTEM_PROPERTIES =
+ "/etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/java.config";
+
/* The java.security properties */
private static Properties props;
@@ -93,6 +100,7 @@
if (sdebug != null) {
sdebug.println("reading security properties file: " +
propFile);
+ sdebug.println(props.toString());
}
} catch (IOException e) {
if (sdebug != null) {
@@ -114,6 +122,31 @@
}
if ("true".equalsIgnoreCase(props.getProperty
+ ("security.useSystemPropertiesFile"))) {
+
+ // now load the system file, if it exists, so its values
+ // will win if they conflict with the earlier values
+ try (BufferedInputStream bis =
+ new BufferedInputStream(new FileInputStream(SYSTEM_PROPERTIES))) {
+ props.load(bis);
+ loadedProps = true;
+
+ if (sdebug != null) {
+ sdebug.println("reading system security properties file " +
+ SYSTEM_PROPERTIES);
+ sdebug.println(props.toString());
+ }
+ } catch (IOException e) {
+ if (sdebug != null) {
+ sdebug.println
+ ("unable to load security properties from " +
+ SYSTEM_PROPERTIES);
+ e.printStackTrace();
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ if ("true".equalsIgnoreCase(props.getProperty
("security.overridePropertiesFile"))) {
String extraPropFile = System.getProperty
diff -r 3d53f19b4838 -r 1c4d5cb2096a src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security
--- a/src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security Wed Oct 26 03:51:39 2016 +0100
+++ b/src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security Wed Nov 02 03:31:54 2016 +0000
@@ -276,6 +276,13 @@
security.overridePropertiesFile=true
#
+# Determines whether this properties file will be appended to
+# using the system properties file stored at
+# /etc/crypto-policies/back-ends/java.config
+#
+security.useSystemPropertiesFile=true
+
+#
# Determines the default key and trust manager factory algorithms for
# the javax.net.ssl package.
#

View File

@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
diff -r e3f940bd3c8f src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security
--- openjdk/src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security Thu Jun 11 21:54:51 2020 +0530
+++ openjdk/src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security Mon Aug 24 10:14:31 2020 +0200
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
#ifdef macosx
security.provider.tbd=Apple
#endif
-security.provider.tbd=SunPKCS11
+#security.provider.tbd=SunPKCS11 ${java.home}/lib/security/nss.cfg
#
# A list of preferred providers for specific algorithms. These providers will

View File

@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
--- openjdk/src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security
+++ openjdk/src/java.base/share/conf/security/java.security
@@ -304,6 +304,8 @@
#
package.access=sun.misc.,\
sun.reflect.,\
+ org.GNOME.Accessibility.,\
+ org.GNOME.Bonobo.,\
#
# List of comma-separated packages that start with or equal this string
@@ -316,6 +318,8 @@
#
package.definition=sun.misc.,\
sun.reflect.,\
+ org.GNOME.Accessibility.,\
+ org.GNOME.Bonobo.,\
#
# Determines whether this properties file can be appended to