packages/openjdk-1.8.0
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

!255 Merge master

Browse Source 
From: @jvmboy
Reviewed-by: @kuenking111
Signed-off-by: @kuenking111
This commit is contained in:
openeuler-ci-bot 2021-12-03 06:04:58 +00:00 committed by Gitee
commit 17e4ca43d8
1 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
openjdk-1.8.0.spec
View File

@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ Provides: java-%{javaver}-%{origin}-accessibility%{?1} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{r
Name: java-%{javaver}-%{origin}
Version: %{javaver}.%{updatever}.%{buildver}
Release: 5
Release: 1
# java-1.5.0-ibm from jpackage.org set Epoch to 1 for unknown reasons
# and this change was brought into RHEL-4. java-1.5.0-ibm packages
# also included the epoch in their virtual provides. This created a
@ -1655,10 +1655,10 @@ export ARCH_DATA_MODEL=64
# We use ourcppflags because the OpenJDK build seems to
# pass EXTRA_CFLAGS to the HotSpot C++ compiler...
EXTRA_CFLAGS="%ourcppflags -Wno-error -fcommon -fsigned-char"
EXTRA_CFLAGS="%ourcppflags -Wno-error -fcommon -fsigned-char -fstack-protector-all"
EXTRA_CPP_FLAGS="%ourcppflags -Wno-error"
EXTRA_ASFLAGS="${EXTRA_CFLAGS} -Wa,--generate-missing-build-notes=yes"
EXTRA_ASFLAGS="${EXTRA_CFLAGS} -Wa,--generate-missing-build-notes=yes -fstack-protector-all"
export EXTRA_CFLAGS EXTRA_ASFLAGS
for suffix in %{build_loop} ; do
@ -2199,6 +2199,9 @@ require "copy_jdk_configs.lua"
%endif
%changelog
* Tue Nov 23 2021 lijingwei <lijingwei@uniontech.com> - 1:1.8.0.312-b07.1
- correct spec file release number typo
* Mon Nov 11 2021 kuenking111 <wangkun49@huawei.com> - 1:1.8.0.312-b07.0
- update to 8u312-b07(ga)
- delete 8194246.patch