!20 [sync] PR-18: delete unused patches

From: @openeuler-sync-bot 
Reviewed-by: @liqingqing_1229 
Signed-off-by: @liqingqing_1229

0001-Fix-segmentation-fault-when-using-offset.patch

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-From 53797364e07e67555ec3b139cf3c3563c7035c11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Chunsheng Luo <luochunsheng@huawei.com>
-Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 17:18:53 +0800
-Subject: [PATCH] shm.c: Fix segmentation fault when using offset
-
-The following command can trigger the bug
-    numactl --offset 4096 --length 65536 --file xxx -p0 --touch
-
-When we create a shm file, we just consider shmlen, but not consider shmoffset,
-resulting in the mapped memory is no within the scope of the new shm file.
----
- shm.c | 12 ++++++++----
- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/shm.c b/shm.c
-index e5192e5..324cfbe 100644
---- a/shm.c
-+++ b/shm.c
-@@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ void attach_sysvshm(char *name, char *opt)
-                      "need a --length to create a sysv shared memory segment");
- 		fprintf(stderr,
-          "numactl: Creating shared memory segment %s id %ld mode %04o length %.fMB\n",
--			name, shmid, shmmode, ((double)shmlen) / (1024*1024) );
--		shmfd = shmget(key, shmlen, IPC_CREAT|shmmode|shmflags);
-+			name, shmid, shmmode, ((double)(shmlen + shmoffset)) / (1024*1024) );
-+		shmfd = shmget(key, shmlen + shmoffset, IPC_CREAT|shmmode|shmflags);
- 		if (shmfd < 0)
- 			nerror("cannot create shared memory segment");
- 	}
-@@ -145,8 +145,12 @@ void attach_shared(char *name, char *opt)
- 	}
- 	if (fstat64(shmfd, &st) < 0)
- 		err("shm stat");
--	if (shmlen > st.st_size) {
--		if (ftruncate64(shmfd, shmlen) < 0) {
-+	/* the file size must be larger than mmap shmlen + shmoffset, otherwise SIGBUS
-+	 * will be caused when we access memory, because mmaped memory is no longer in
-+	 * the range of the file laster.
-+	 */
-+	if ((shmlen + shmoffset) > st.st_size) {
-+		if (ftruncate64(shmfd, shmlen + shmoffset) < 0) {
- 			/* XXX: we could do it by hand, but it would it
- 			   would be impossible to apply policy then.
- 			   need to fix that in the kernel. */

0002-fix-verify_shm-memcmp-nodes.patch

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-From c833565be79f2ef2541459f2d8444894abd9d939 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Chunsheng Luo <luochunsheng@huawei.com>
-Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 18:10:53 +0800
-Subject: [PATCH] shm.c: fix verify_shm memcmp nodes
-
-When nodemask_sz is large 64 (CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT > 6), verify_shm
-will output wrong result "mismatched node mask". that's not what we
-expected, we expected compare nodes->maskp.
----
- shm.c | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/shm.c b/shm.c
-index 324cfbe..3cf3d2b 100644
---- a/shm.c
-+++ b/shm.c
-@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ void verify_shm(int policy, struct bitmask *nodes)
- 			      policy_name(pol2), policy_name(policy));
- 			return;
- 		}
--		if (memcmp(nodes2, nodes, numa_bitmask_nbytes(nodes))) {
-+		if (memcmp(nodes2->maskp, nodes->maskp, numa_bitmask_nbytes(nodes))) {
- 			vwarn(p, "mismatched node mask\n");
- 			printmask("expected", nodes);
- 			printmask("real", nodes2);

numactl.spec

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name: numactl
 Version: 2.0.16
-Release: 1
+Release: 2
 Summary: Library for tuning for Non Uniform Memory Access machines
 License: GPLv2
 URL: https://github.com/numactl/numactl
@@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/.libs make check
 %{_mandir}/man3/*.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Nov 9 2022 Chunsheng Luo<luochunsheng@huawei.com> - 2.0.16-2
+- delete unused patches
+
 * Wed Nov 9 2022 Chunsheng Luo<luochunsheng@huawei.com> - 2.0.16-1
 - update version to 2.0.16