!17 add upstream patch for 4.2.0

From: @WizardHowl 
Reviewed-by: @SuperSix173 
Signed-off-by: @SuperSix173

mpfr-tests-tsprintf.c-Modified-a-buggy-test-of-the-thousa.patch

@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-From 5172494c09718ffcb7ef1f19b3b211e3bce8781a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@vinc17.net>
-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:05:17 +0100
-Subject: [PATCH] [tests/tsprintf.c] Modified a buggy test of the thousands
- separator.
-
-The test
-
-  check_vsprintf ("+01,234,567  :", "%0+ -'13.10Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567);
-
-is based on the output from glibc up to 2.36, which is incorrect:
-
-  https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23432
-
-The GNU C Library has apparently been partially fixed in its Git
-repository for the future 2.37, since a tsprintf failure has been
-reported (this is a bug in this test, not in the MPFR library):
-
-  https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/mpfr/2023-01/msg00001.html
-
-So, modified the test to avoid the particular case of leading zeros
-due to the precision field larger than the number of digits. This
-case has already been tested without the thousands separator (where
-there are no issues with the C libraries), so that we do not miss
-much testing. Added a comment explaining the issue and a possible
-solution for future testing of this particular case (if need be).
----
- tests/tsprintf.c | 12 +++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/tests/tsprintf.c b/tests/tsprintf.c
-index c68b2ba71..c0182503b 100644
---- a/tests/tsprintf.c
-+++ b/tests/tsprintf.c
-@@ -1719,7 +1719,17 @@ test_locale (void)
-   check_sprintf ("000000001,000", "%'013.4Rg", x);
- 
- #ifdef PRINTF_GROUPFLAG
--  check_vsprintf ("+01,234,567  :", "%0+ -'13.10Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567);
-+  /* Do not test the thousands separator with a precision field larger
-+     than the number of digits (thus needing leading zeros), such as
-+     "%0+ -'13.10Pd:" (used up to MPFR 4.2.0), since the GNU libc is
-+     buggy: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23432
-+     We don't know about the other implementations.
-+     If we wanted to check that and avoid a failure of the test because of
-+     a buggy C library (while MPFR would be consistent with the C library),
-+     we could compare the MPFR output with both the correct output and the
-+     output from the C library (possibly buggy). But to do that in a clean
-+     way, this would require a change in the check_vsprintf() call. */
-+  check_vsprintf ("+1,234,567   :", "%0+ -'13Pd:", (mpfr_prec_t) 1234567);
- #endif
- 
-   mpfr_clear (x);
--- 
-2.33.0
-

mpfr.spec

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name: mpfr
 Version: 4.2.0
-Release: 2
+Release: 3
 Summary: A C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations
 URL: http://www.mpfr.org/
 License: LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+ and GFDL-1.2-only
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Requires: gmp >= 4.2.3
 
 Source0: http://www.mpfr.org/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
 
-Patch1: mpfr-tests-tsprintf.c-Modified-a-buggy-test-of-the-thousa.patch
+Patch1: backport-allpatches.patch 
 
 %description
 MPFR is a C library for arbitrary-precision binary floating-point computation 
@@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ fi
 %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/mpfr.pc
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Nov 27 2023 Wenyu Liu<liuwenyu7@huawei.com> - 4.2.0-3
+- Add upstream patch for 4.2.0.
+
 * Fri Aug 4 2023 Wenyu Liu<liuwenyu7@huawei.com> - 4.2.0-2
 - Modified a buggy test of the thousands separator.