cpuview: fix possible use-after-free in find_proc_stat_node
Signed-off-by: yangjiaqi <yangjiaqi16@huawei.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f52286e154
commit
c4b6dca0f6
109
0022-cpuview-fix-possible-use-after-free-in-find_proc_sta.patch
Normal file
109
0022-cpuview-fix-possible-use-after-free-in-find_proc_sta.patch
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
||||
From 765d4c48aeaad779008f82ff6643d9cdbe917bd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
|
||||
From: yangjiaqi <yangjiaqi16@huawei.com>
|
||||
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 09:31:04 +0800
|
||||
Subject: [PATCH] cpuview: fix possible use-after-free in find_proc_stat_node
|
||||
|
||||
Signed-off-by: yangjiaqi <yangjiaqi16@huawei.com>
|
||||
---
|
||||
src/proc_cpuview.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
|
||||
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
|
||||
|
||||
diff --git a/src/proc_cpuview.c b/src/proc_cpuview.c
|
||||
index 75006a6..207a6df 100644
|
||||
--- a/src/proc_cpuview.c
|
||||
+++ b/src/proc_cpuview.c
|
||||
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ static struct cg_proc_stat *add_proc_stat_node(struct cg_proc_stat *new_node)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out_rwlock_unlock:
|
||||
+ pthread_mutex_lock(&rv->lock);
|
||||
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&head->lock);
|
||||
return move_ptr(rv);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -224,6 +225,7 @@ static bool cgroup_supports(const char *controller, const char *cgroup,
|
||||
return faccessat(cfd, path, F_OK, 0) == 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+/* should be called with wr-locked list */
|
||||
static struct cg_proc_stat *prune_proc_stat_list(struct cg_proc_stat *node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cg_proc_stat *first = NULL;
|
||||
@@ -232,6 +234,31 @@ static struct cg_proc_stat *prune_proc_stat_list(struct cg_proc_stat *node)
|
||||
if (!cgroup_supports("cpu", node->cg, "cpu.shares")) {
|
||||
struct cg_proc_stat *cur = node;
|
||||
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * We need to ensure that no one referenced this node,
|
||||
+ * because we are going to remove it from the list and free memory.
|
||||
+ *
|
||||
+ * If we can't grab the lock then just keep this node for now.
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ if (pthread_mutex_trylock(&cur->lock))
|
||||
+ goto next;
|
||||
+
|
||||
+ /*
|
||||
+ * Yes, we can put lock back just after taking it, as we ensured
|
||||
+ * that we are only one user of it right now.
|
||||
+ *
|
||||
+ * It follows from three facts:
|
||||
+ * - we are under pthread_rwlock_wrlock(hash_table_bucket)
|
||||
+ * - pthread_mutex_lock is taken by find_proc_stat_node()
|
||||
+ * with pthread_rwlock_rdlock(hash_table_bucket) held.
|
||||
+ * - pthread_mutex_lock is taken by add_proc_stat_node()
|
||||
+ * with pthread_rwlock_wrlock(hash_table_bucket) held.
|
||||
+ *
|
||||
+ * It means that nobody can get a pointer to (cur) node in a parallel
|
||||
+ * thread and all old users of (cur) node have released pthread_mutex_lock(cur).
|
||||
+ */
|
||||
+ pthread_mutex_unlock(&cur->lock);
|
||||
+
|
||||
if (prev)
|
||||
prev->next = node->next;
|
||||
else
|
||||
@@ -242,6 +269,7 @@ static struct cg_proc_stat *prune_proc_stat_list(struct cg_proc_stat *node)
|
||||
|
||||
free_proc_stat_node(cur);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
+next:
|
||||
if (!first)
|
||||
first = node;
|
||||
prev = node;
|
||||
@@ -279,6 +307,7 @@ static struct cg_proc_stat *find_proc_stat_node(struct cg_proc_stat_head *head,
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cg_proc_stat *node;
|
||||
|
||||
+ prune_proc_stat_history();
|
||||
pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&head->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!head->next) {
|
||||
@@ -289,15 +318,16 @@ static struct cg_proc_stat *find_proc_stat_node(struct cg_proc_stat_head *head,
|
||||
node = head->next;
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
- if (strcmp(cg, node->cg) == 0)
|
||||
+ if (strcmp(cg, node->cg) == 0) {
|
||||
+ pthread_mutex_lock(&node->lock);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
+ }
|
||||
} while ((node = node->next));
|
||||
|
||||
node = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
pthread_rwlock_unlock(&head->lock);
|
||||
- prune_proc_stat_history();
|
||||
return node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -318,8 +348,6 @@ static struct cg_proc_stat *find_or_create_proc_stat_node(struct cpuacct_usage *
|
||||
lxcfs_debug("New stat node (%d) for %s\n", cpu_count, cg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
- pthread_mutex_lock(&node->lock);
|
||||
-
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If additional CPUs on the host have been enabled, CPU usage counter
|
||||
* arrays have to be expanded.
|
||||
--
|
||||
2.30.0
|
||||
|
||||
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
||||
#Basic Information
|
||||
Name: lxcfs
|
||||
Version: 4.0.11
|
||||
Release: 6
|
||||
Release: 7
|
||||
Summary: FUSE filesystem for LXC
|
||||
License: LGPL 2.1+
|
||||
URL: http://linuxcontainers.org
|
||||
@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ Patch9018: 0018-fix-deadlock-problem-when-subprocess-exit.patch
|
||||
Patch9019: 0019-fix-dev-read-memory-leak-in-container.patch
|
||||
Patch9020: 0020-enable-cfs-option-to-show-correct-proc-cpuinfo-view.patch
|
||||
Patch9021: 0021-fix-pidfd_open-pidfd_send_signal-function-compilatio.patch
|
||||
Patch9022: 0022-cpuview-fix-possible-use-after-free-in-find_proc_sta.patch
|
||||
|
||||
#Dependency
|
||||
BuildRequires: autoconf automake libtool help2man
|
||||
@ -92,6 +93,12 @@ fi
|
||||
%{_unitdir}/*
|
||||
|
||||
%changelog
|
||||
* Wed Mar 22 2023 yangjiaqi <yangjiaqi16@huawei.com> - 4.0.11-7
|
||||
- Type:bugfix
|
||||
- CVE:NA
|
||||
- SUG:NA
|
||||
- DESC:fix possible use-after-free in find_proc_stat_node
|
||||
|
||||
* Mon Dec 12 2022 yangjiaqi <yangjiaqi16@huawei.com> - 4.0.11-6
|
||||
- add yaml
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user