harfbuzz/backport-CVE-2023-25193.patch
2023-02-15 06:23:31 +00:00

39 lines
1.4 KiB
Diff

From 85be877925ddbf34f74a1229f3ca1716bb6170dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 20:00:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [layout] Limit how far we skip when looking back
See comments.
---
src/hb-ot-layout-gsubgpos.hh | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/hb-ot-layout-gsubgpos.hh b/src/hb-ot-layout-gsubgpos.hh
index c9750ff..b83f49e 100644
--- a/src/hb-ot-layout-gsubgpos.hh
+++ b/src/hb-ot-layout-gsubgpos.hh
@@ -560,7 +560,19 @@ struct hb_ot_apply_context_t :
bool prev (unsigned *unsafe_from = nullptr)
{
assert (num_items > 0);
- while (idx > num_items - 1)
+ /* The alternate condition below is faster at string boundaries,
+ * but produces subpar "unsafe-to-concat" values. */
+ unsigned stop = num_items - 1;
+ if (c->buffer->flags & HB_BUFFER_FLAG_PRODUCE_UNSAFE_TO_CONCAT)
+ stop = 1 - 1;
+
+ /* When looking back, limit how far we search; this function is mostly
+ * used for looking back for base glyphs when attaching marks. If we
+ * don't limit, we can get O(n^2) behavior where n is the number of
+ * consecutive marks. */
+ stop = (unsigned) hb_max ((int) stop, (int) idx - HB_MAX_CONTEXT_LENGTH);
+
+ while (idx > stop)
{
idx--;
const hb_glyph_info_t &info = c->buffer->out_info[idx];
--
2.33.0