update to 2.9.1

avoid-exceed-int-range.patch

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+From 85158d45ec66c34f5903a15c3b74600a925703ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: zhangyiru <zhanguyiru@huawei.com>
+Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 22:16:15 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH] avoid display problem if memleak exceeds range of int 
+if memleak exceeds range of int, heap checker result is incorrect, so
+change it to size_t
+---
+ src/heap-profile-table.cc | 4 ++--
+ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
+diff --git a/src/heap-profile-table.cc b/src/heap-profile-table.cc
+index c3ce41c..1001fb3 100644
+--- a/src/heap-profile-table.cc
++++ b/src/heap-profile-table.cc
+@@ -517,7 +517,7 @@ HeapProfileTable::Snapshot* HeapProfileTable::NonLiveSnapshot(
+ // Information kept per unique bucket seen
+ struct HeapProfileTable::Snapshot::Entry {
+   int count;
+-  int bytes;
++  size_t bytes;
+   Bucket* bucket;
+   Entry() : count(0), bytes(0) { }
+ 
+@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ void HeapProfileTable::Snapshot::ReportLeaks(const char* checker_name,
+   for (int i = 0; i < to_report; i++) {
+     const Entry& e = entries[i];
+     base::RawPrinter printer(buffer, kBufSize);
+-    printer.Printf("Leak of %d bytes in %d objects allocated from:\n",
++    printer.Printf("Leak of %zu bytes in %d objects allocated from:\n",
+                    e.bytes, e.count);
+     for (int j = 0; j < e.bucket->depth; j++) {
+       const void* pc = e.bucket->stack[j];
+-- 
+2.27.0

gperftools.spec

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:	 gperftools
-Version: 2.8.1
-Release: 3
+Version: 2.9.1
+Release: 1
 Summary: high-performance malloc and performance analysis tools
 
 License: BSD
@@ -9,9 +9,10 @@ Source0: https://github.com/gperftools/gperftools/releases/download/%{name}-%{ve
 patch1:		gperftools-generic-dynamic-tls.patch
 Patch9000:	issue-1122-fix-bus-error-on-aarch64.patch
 #https://github.com/gperftools/gperftools/issues/1309
-Patch9001:	skip-arm-in-stacktrace_unittest.patch
+#Patch9001:	skip-arm-in-stacktrace_unittest.patch
 #https://github.com/gperftools/gperftools/issues/890
-Patch9002:	skip-heapchecker-in-arm-arch.patch
+Patch9001:	skip-heapchecker-in-arm-arch.patch
+Patch9002:	avoid-exceed-int-range.patch
 
 BuildRequires: autoconf automake gcc-c++
 BuildRequires: libtool libunwind-devel perl-generators
@@ -106,6 +107,12 @@ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./.libs make check
 %{_mandir}/man1/*.1.gz
 
 %changelog
+* Mon Nov 29 2021 zhangyiru <zhangyiru3@huawei.com> - 2.9.1-1
+- update to 2.9.1
+
+* Tue Nov 9 2021 zhangyiru <zhangyiru3@huawei.com> - 2.8.1-4
+- avoid exceed int range when use heapchecker
+
 * Wed Oct 20 2021 zhangyiru <zhangyiru3@huawei.com> - 2.8.1-3
 - enable make check && skip four arm testcases. 
   the reason is that arm do not have fully functional heap checker and 

skip-arm-in-stacktrace_unittest.patch

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-From a4ae4584f8e38fb96ed7adc33231afd19f161e1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From abf1ed0ce1340320474a4cf3b790b7b741b9a577 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: zhangyiru <zhangyiru3@huawei.com>
-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:29:09 -0400
-Subject: [PATCH] skip-arm-in-stacktrace_unittest
+Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:35:01 +0800
+Subject: [PATCH] skip stacktrace_unittest in arm
 
 the calling of unw_step in arm stacktrace_unittest is incorrect, but the
 function is not affected, so skip it.
@@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ Signed-off-by: zhangyiru <zhangyiru3@huawei.com>
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
 
 diff --git a/src/tests/stacktrace_unittest.cc b/src/tests/stacktrace_unittest.cc
-index 3c9f735..37a90a6 100644
+index e55a632..85c0bcd 100644
 --- a/src/tests/stacktrace_unittest.cc
 +++ b/src/tests/stacktrace_unittest.cc
-@@ -188,7 +188,12 @@ void ATTRIBUTE_NOINLINE CheckStackTrace(int i) {
+@@ -285,8 +285,13 @@ void ATTRIBUTE_NOINLINE CheckStackTrace(int i) {
  //-----------------------------------------------------------------------//
  
  int main(int argc, char ** argv) {
@@ -26,8 +26,9 @@ index 3c9f735..37a90a6 100644
 +  printf("ARM SKIP\n");
 +  exit(77);
 +#endif
-   return 0;
- }
+ 
+ #if TEST_UCONTEXT_BITS
+   leaf_capture_fn = CaptureLeafUContext;
 -- 
-2.27.0
+1.8.3.1