flatpak/backport-0005-CVE-2021-41133.patch
2021-10-21 10:29:26 +08:00

46 lines
1.5 KiB
Diff

From 9766ee05b1425db397d2cf23afd24c7f6146a69f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 12:45:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] run: Disallow recently-added mount-manipulation syscalls
If we don't allow mount() then we shouldn't allow these either.
Partially fixes GHSA-67h7-w3jq-vh4q.
Thanks: an anonymous reporter
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
Conflict:NA
Reference:https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/commit/9766ee05b1425db397d2cf23afd24c7f6146a69f
---
common/flatpak-run.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/common/flatpak-run.c b/common/flatpak-run.c
index dad0cfe..2781694 100644
--- a/common/flatpak-run.c
+++ b/common/flatpak-run.c
@@ -2838,6 +2838,18 @@ setup_seccomp (FlatpakBwrap *bwrap,
* Return ENOSYS so user-space will fall back to clone().
* (GHSA-67h7-w3jq-vh4q; see also https://github.com/moby/moby/commit/9f6b562d) */
{SCMP_SYS (clone3), ENOSYS},
+
+ /* New mount manipulation APIs can also change our VFS. There's no
+ * legitimate reason to do these in the sandbox, so block all of them
+ * rather than thinking about which ones might be dangerous.
+ * (GHSA-67h7-w3jq-vh4q) */
+ {SCMP_SYS (open_tree), ENOSYS},
+ {SCMP_SYS (move_mount), ENOSYS},
+ {SCMP_SYS (fsopen), ENOSYS},
+ {SCMP_SYS (fsconfig), ENOSYS},
+ {SCMP_SYS (fsmount), ENOSYS},
+ {SCMP_SYS (fspick), ENOSYS},
+ {SCMP_SYS (mount_setattr), ENOSYS},
};
struct
--
2.27.0