packages/dpdk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
dpdk/0024-net-hns3-refactor-handle-mailbox-function.patch
Dengdui Huang 1f34bd76e4 sync some patchs from upstreaming 
Sync some patches for hns3 about refactor mailbox, add new API for RSS,
support power monitor and some bugfix, modifies are as follow:
 - app/testpmd: fix crash in multi -process forwarding
 - net/hns3: support power monitor
 - net/hns3: remove QinQ insert support for VF
 - net/hns3: fix reset level comparison
 - net/hns3: fix disable command with firmware
 - net/hns3: fix VF multiple count on one reset
 - net/hns3: refactor handle mailbox function
 - net/hns3: refactor send mailbox function
 - net/hns3: refactor PF mailbox message struct
 - net/hns3: refactor VF mailbox message struct
 - app/testpmd: set RSS hash algorithm
 - ethdev: get RSS hash algorithm by name
 - ring: add telemetry command for ring info
 - ring: add telemetry command to list rings
 - eal: introduce more macros for bit definition
 - dmadev: add tracepoints in data path API
 - dmadev: add telemetry capability for m2d auto free
 - maintainers: update for DMA device performance tool

Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
2024-03-05 16:15:56 +08:00

189 lines
6.3 KiB
Diff
Raw Permalink Blame History

From f6f87e815c8bc4e287e8f37abfd969464658ea29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 14:55:08 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 24/30] net/hns3: refactor handle mailbox function
[ upstream commit 277d522ae39f6c9daa38c5ad5d3b94f632f9cf49 ]
The mailbox messages of the PF and VF are processed in
the same function. The PF and VF call the same function
to process the messages. This code is excessive coupling
and isn't good for maintenance. Therefore, this patch
separates the interfaces that handle PF mailbox message
and handle VF mailbox message.
Fixes: 463e748964f5 ("net/hns3: support mailbox")
Fixes: 109e4dd1bd7a ("net/hns3: get link state change through mailbox")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jie Hai <haijie1@huawei.com>
---
drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c | 4 +-
drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h | 3 +-
4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c
index ae81368..bccd9db 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev.c
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ hns3_interrupt_handler(void *param)
hns3_warn(hw, "received reset interrupt");
hns3_schedule_reset(hns);
} else if (event_cause == HNS3_VECTOR0_EVENT_MBX) {
- hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
+ hns3pf_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
} else if (event_cause != HNS3_VECTOR0_EVENT_PTP) {
hns3_warn(hw, "received unknown event: vector0_int_stat:0x%x "
"ras_int_stat:0x%x cmdq_int_stat:0x%x",
diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c
index b0d0c29..f5a7a2b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_ethdev_vf.c
@@ -618,7 +618,7 @@ hns3vf_interrupt_handler(void *param)
hns3_schedule_reset(hns);
break;
case HNS3VF_VECTOR0_EVENT_MBX:
- hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
+ hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
break;
default:
break;
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ hns3vf_get_push_lsc_cap(struct hns3_hw *hw)
* driver has to actively handle the HNS3_MBX_LINK_STAT_CHANGE
* mailbox from PF driver to get this capability.
*/
- hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
+ hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
if (__atomic_load_n(&vf->pf_push_lsc_cap, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) !=
HNS3_PF_PUSH_LSC_CAP_UNKNOWN)
break;
diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
index 43195ff..9cdbc16 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ hns3_get_mbx_resp(struct hns3_hw *hw, uint16_t code, uint16_t subcode,
return -EIO;
}
- hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
+ hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(hw);
rte_delay_us(HNS3_WAIT_RESP_US);
if (hw->mbx_resp.received_match_resp)
@@ -372,9 +372,57 @@ hns3_handle_mbx_msg_out_intr(struct hns3_hw *hw)
}
void
-hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
+hns3pf_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
+{
+ struct hns3_cmq_ring *crq = &hw->cmq.crq;
+ struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *req;
+ struct hns3_cmd_desc *desc;
+ uint16_t flag;
+
+ rte_spinlock_lock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
+
+ while (!hns3_cmd_crq_empty(hw)) {
+ if (__atomic_load_n(&hw->reset.disable_cmd, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)) {
+ rte_spinlock_unlock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
+ return;
+ }
+ desc = &crq->desc[crq->next_to_use];
+ req = (struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *)desc->data;
+
+ flag = rte_le_to_cpu_16(crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].flag);
+ if (unlikely(!hns3_get_bit(flag, HNS3_CMDQ_RX_OUTVLD_B))) {
+ hns3_warn(hw,
+ "dropped invalid mailbox message, code = %u",
+ req->msg.code);
+
+ /* dropping/not processing this invalid message */
+ crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].flag = 0;
+ hns3_mbx_ring_ptr_move_crq(crq);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ switch (req->msg.code) {
+ case HNS3_MBX_PUSH_LINK_STATUS:
+ hns3pf_handle_link_change_event(hw, req);
+ break;
+ default:
+ hns3_err(hw, "received unsupported(%u) mbx msg",
+ req->msg.code);
+ break;
+ }
+ crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].flag = 0;
+ hns3_mbx_ring_ptr_move_crq(crq);
+ }
+
+ /* Write back CMDQ_RQ header pointer, IMP need this pointer */
+ hns3_write_dev(hw, HNS3_CMDQ_RX_HEAD_REG, crq->next_to_use);
+
+ rte_spinlock_unlock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
+}
+
+void
+hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
{
- struct hns3_adapter *hns = HNS3_DEV_HW_TO_ADAPTER(hw);
struct hns3_cmq_ring *crq = &hw->cmq.crq;
struct hns3_mbx_pf_to_vf_cmd *req;
struct hns3_cmd_desc *desc;
@@ -385,7 +433,7 @@ hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
rte_spinlock_lock(&hw->cmq.crq.lock);
handle_out = (rte_eal_process_type() != RTE_PROC_PRIMARY ||
- !rte_thread_is_intr()) && hns->is_vf;
+ !rte_thread_is_intr());
if (handle_out) {
/*
* Currently, any threads in the primary and secondary processes
@@ -430,8 +478,7 @@ hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
continue;
}
- handle_out = hns->is_vf && desc->opcode == 0;
- if (handle_out) {
+ if (desc->opcode == 0) {
/* Message already processed by other thread */
crq->desc[crq->next_to_use].flag = 0;
hns3_mbx_ring_ptr_move_crq(crq);
@@ -448,16 +495,6 @@ hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw)
case HNS3_MBX_ASSERTING_RESET:
hns3_handle_asserting_reset(hw, req);
break;
- case HNS3_MBX_PUSH_LINK_STATUS:
- /*
- * This message is reported by the firmware and is
- * reported in 'struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd' format.
- * Therefore, we should cast the req variable to
- * 'struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd' and then process it.
- */
- hns3pf_handle_link_change_event(hw,
- (struct hns3_mbx_vf_to_pf_cmd *)req);
- break;
case HNS3_MBX_PUSH_VLAN_INFO:
/*
* When the PVID configuration status of VF device is
diff --git a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h
index 2952b96..2b6cb8f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/hns3/hns3_mbx.h
@@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ struct hns3_pf_rst_done_cmd {
((crq)->next_to_use = ((crq)->next_to_use + 1) % (crq)->desc_num)
struct hns3_hw;
-void hns3_dev_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw);
+void hns3pf_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw);
+void hns3vf_handle_mbx_msg(struct hns3_hw *hw);
void hns3vf_mbx_setup(struct hns3_vf_to_pf_msg *req,
uint8_t code, uint8_t subcode);
int hns3vf_mbx_send(struct hns3_hw *hw,
--
2.33.0
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink