bind/backport-0016-Properly-free-up-enqueued-netievents-in-nm_destroy.patch
2023-01-09 16:44:23 +08:00

41 lines
1.5 KiB
Diff

From af2bddc242ae963c89e2f06e5a2587479ceced99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej=20Sur=C3=BD?= <ondrej@isc.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 22:04:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Properly free up enqueued netievents in nm_destroy()
When the isc_netmgr is being destroyed, the normal and priority queues
should be dequeued and netievents properly freed. This wasn't the case.
(cherry picked from commit 88418c33729804cc86a9492e3e30f1123f56ddcd)
Conflict: isc_mem_put to isc_mempool_put
Reference: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/commit/af2bddc242ae963c89e2f06e5a2587479ceced99
---
lib/isc/netmgr/netmgr.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/isc/netmgr/netmgr.c b/lib/isc/netmgr/netmgr.c
index ff5fd0f..6c24d41 100644
--- a/lib/isc/netmgr/netmgr.c
+++ b/lib/isc/netmgr/netmgr.c
@@ -418,14 +418,14 @@ nm_destroy(isc_nm_t **mgr0) {
/* Empty the async event queues */
while ((ievent = DEQUEUE_PRIORITY_NETIEVENT(worker)) != NULL) {
- isc_mempool_put(mgr->evpool, ievent);
+ isc__nm_put_netievent(mgr, ievent);
}
INSIST(DEQUEUE_PRIVILEGED_NETIEVENT(worker) == NULL);
INSIST(DEQUEUE_TASK_NETIEVENT(worker) == NULL);
- while ((ievent = DEQUEUE_PRIORITY_NETIEVENT(worker)) != NULL) {
- isc_mempool_put(mgr->evpool, ievent);
+ while ((ievent = DEQUEUE_NORMAL_NETIEVENT(worker)) != NULL) {
+ isc__nm_put_netievent(mgr, ievent);
}
isc_condition_destroy(&worker->cond_prio);
isc_mutex_destroy(&worker->lock);
--
2.27.0